Fiscal Court seeks 911 fee, electric companies strongly oppose image

West Kentucky Rural Electric Company’s (WKRECC) legal counsel Greg Carter (center), Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation (JPEC) President and CEO Greg Grissom (left) and WKRECC President and CEO David Smart (just behind Carter) spoke in opposition of an ordinance aimed at imposing a 911 fee on all electric meters during today’s Marshall County Fiscal Court meeting.


The Marshall County Fiscal Court heard the first reading this morning of an ordinance aimed at attaching a monthly fee to each electric box in the county for the purpose of funding Marshall County E-911. But representatives of two local electric providers stood up during the meeting and, without mincing words, impressed upon the fiscal court members their entities will take legal action to oppose the measure.

West Kentucky Rural Electric Company (WKRECC) President and CEO David Smart, WKRECC’s legal counsel Greg Carter and Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation (JPEC) President and CEO Greg Grissom each addressed the fiscal court members just following the first reading. They said that although they support dispatchers and are aware of the vital service E-911 provides to the community, they were vehemently opposed to being tasked with collecting a fee on behalf of the fiscal court.

Grissom said the collections process would put a burden on the companies, both of which service customers in multiple counties and manage complex billings systems. He noted the ordinance designates three percent of the collected funds would remain with the electric companies as compensation for the collections service, but said he didn’t believe that would cover the cost.

Smart reminded the court that in addition to their local boards, the entities are also overseen by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and Public Service Commission (PSC), both of which will have to get involved in the process. He also noted the electric companies will have no authority over the members who refuse to pay, saying, “We cannot disconnect service for them not paying that bill.”

Grissom and Smart said each of their boards of directors have passed resolutions in opposition to the measure and have authorized them as senior management to take any legal action necessary to defend their position. They further advised the court to “utilize the path that is already created” in other counties and task the Property Valuation Administration (PVA) with collection of the fee.

But Marshall County Attorney Jason Darnall said utilizing the PVA would result in a missed opportunity and Neal said the electric meter “is more fair” in their opinion.

Marshall County Judge-Executive Kevin Neal said a second reading of the ordinance is scheduled for the Aug. 20 fiscal court meeting.

The first reading indicated the fee will be imposed monthly on each electric meter on both residential and commercial properties. There was a blank in the space which should indicated the amount of the fee. As it’s currently worded, the electric companies would be allowed to keep three percent as a collection fee.

Just following the meeting Neal said, "It is disingenuous for the electrical providers to argue that they are not in the business of collecting fees for a public entity because they are already, and have been for years, collecting school taxes on gross receipts. And in that case, the providers are passing those taxes onto us as the end users. So when you pay your electric bill, you are paying the providers' taxes for them."

"We can debate all day about what is a fee and what is a tax," he added. "But the case cited in our ordinance is from the Kentucky Court of Appeals upholding the validity of a 911 fee on water meters. We see no practical difference between water meters and electric meters."

Also following the meeting, Grissom and Smart submitted a statement on behalf of WKRECC and JPEC: "Jackson Purchase Energy Corporation and West Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation recognize the importance of 911 services and we strive to be good corporate citizens and community partners. However, our boards, who are elected by and accountable to our members, do not believe collecting 911 fees is in the best interest of our members and have resolved to not collect these fees and to take legal action as necessary to defend our position. Existing law supports the use of the county PVA to collect 911 fees."

Smart said, "West Kentucky RECC encourages the court to use the path that is already established to collect these fees without imposing unnecessary obligations to private entities."

Grissom added, "We respectfully ask the fiscal court of Marshall County to reconsider its position on the first reading of this ordinance. Jackson Purchase Energy is a member-owned cooperative corporation which should not be required to collect fees on behalf of the local government."

Kentucky Electric Cooperatives (KEC) also issued a statement saying it understands and appreciates the need for Kentucky’s local governments to have adequately funded 911 services and understands the need for alternative funding mechanisms as supporting funds from landline phone services have diminished.

“However, Kentucky Electric Cooperatives opposes any local government efforts to force a rural electric cooperative, or other electric utility, to collect a 911 service fee on the local government’s behalf because such a mandate will result in burdensome administrative costs and higher electric bills for Kentuckians,” the statement read in part.

KEC stated it has reached out to the Kentucky Association of Counties to help identify “an appropriate funding mechanism” that will allow local governments to fund 911 services without raising the cost of electric utility services across the commonwealth.

“For that reason, we encourage any local government seeking increased funding for its 911 services to follow an already crafted solution that has been upheld by the Supreme Court, which approved a 911 fee on occupied residential and commercial properties that was collected directly by the local government,” the statement reads.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.